So you go to GOOGLE, type up 'Sienna Miller Topless' or whomever.. and you get tons and tons of web page returns.  Fanastic right? 

We know the saying, '57 channels and nothing on'.  Bascically, the more that is out there, the more shit you have to syphon through.  Take for example a website like, egotastic.com

They offer loads upon loads of salacious celeb pics, the only problem is, they put their watermarks all over the phucking things. 

Listen, it's not as if Egotastic or any of the other 10 million celeb pic sites (SM included) actually take the pictures.  It's not as if they sit in bushes for hours and hours on end with their mega expensive telephoto cameras... on payroll with, The Sun or The Enquirer or anything like that.  No, they surf and scour the web for the latest and hottest pics.  So why, when they pinch these pics from other sites, do they claim them for their own? 

Or why do assholes like Perez Hilton put phaggy little comments right across the money shot? 

Not here kids, on SM, what you will find are completely ripped off, unoriginal photos of celebs - for free with no watermarks or any gay little stars covering nipples etc.  Enjoy.